By M. Jary
Statement is a time period usually utilized in linguistics and philosophy yet hardly ever outlined. This in-depth research surveys and synthesizes more than a few philosophical, linguistic and mental literature at the subject, after which offers an in depth account of the cognitive approaches eager about the translation of assertions.
Read or Download Assertion (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition) PDF
Best semantics books
This booklet offers a wealth of data on the most attention-grabbing languages on the earth, such a lot of them little-known within the linguistics literature. the celebrated workforce of authors have every one tested ''valency-changing mechanisms'' (phenomena together with passives and causatives) in languages starting from Amazonian Tariana to Alaskan Eskimo, from Australian Ngan'gityemerri to Tsez from the Caucasus.
Semantic Leaps explores how humans mix wisdom from varied domain names in an effort to comprehend and show new principles. focusing on dynamic points of online which means building, Coulson identifies similar units of approaches: frame-shifting and conceptual mixing. through addressing linguistic phenomena usually missed in conventional that means learn, Coulson explains how techniques of cross-domain mapping, frame-shifting, and conceptual mixing improve the explanatory adequacy of conventional frame-based platforms for typical language processing.
On Conditionals presents the 1st significant cross-disciplinary account of conditional (if-then) buildings. Conditional sentences without delay replicate the language user's skill to cause approximately possible choices, uncertainties, and unrealised contingencies. An figuring out of the conceptual and behavioural supplier interested by the development and interpretation of those different types of sentences hence offers basic insights into the inferential ideas and the cognitive and linguistic tactics of humans.
The pioneering linguist Benjamin Whorf (1897--1941) grasped the courting among human language and human pondering: how language can form our innermost innovations. His simple thesis is that our belief of the area and our methods of wondering it are deeply prompted by way of the constitution of the languages we converse.
- Speaking of Events
- The Semantics of Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Perspective
- The Semantics of Determiners
- Tense and Aspect in Informal Welsh
Additional info for Assertion (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition)
If she has the intention advertised, then she asks a question. The assertion that the speaker wishes to see made correct, in the case of orders, or affirmed or denied, in the case of questions, is identified by the hearer as the assertion that would be performed by the use of a proto-assertion constructed from the lexical elements of the imperative or interrogative sentence. Thus it is not necessary, according to Barker, to assume that there is a common propositional core that (28) to (30) share in order to explain the sense in which they are about the same state of affairs.
As we have just seen, to treat a sentence as true is, on Dummett’s account, to grasp its practical and inferential consequences. What behaviour would count as evidence of grasping these? While other forms of behaviour might demonstrate a grasp of some of the practical consequences of treating a sentence as true, many, perhaps most, of its inferential consequences can only be demonstrated by asserting (or assenting to assertions of) those consequences and denying those statements which are not consequences.
The first problem is that the perception-by-proxy view does not recognise a distinction between understanding an assertion and accepting it. com - licensed to Universitetsbiblioteket i Tromso - PalgraveConnect - 2011-04-20 40 While it is certainly the case that we unreflectively accept many of the assertions directed at us, it is also undoubtedly true that there are many assertions directed at us which we do not accept; yet we still understand these. Comprehension and acceptance, then, are different things, and what a theory of assertion qua speech act should do (especially if it wants to respect the illocutionary/perlocutionary distinction), is to explain the former, not the latter.
Assertion (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition) by M. Jary